Security Alerts

Apache Tomcat CVE-2025-24813: when partial PUT and write-enabled uploads become a bigger problem

Apache Tomcat CVE-2025-24813 is not a universal internet doom bug, but the right combination of write-enabled default servlet behavior and upload paths can still turn it into a serious exposure.

Eng. Hussein Ali Al-AssaadPublished May 20, 2026Updated May 20, 20262 min read
Apache Tomcat security alert cover image showing an upload path, partial PUT handling, and a web server warning symbol.

Key takeaways

  • whether writes are enabled on the default servlet anywhere
  • which applications expose upload paths publicly
  • whether legacy deployment guides introduced risky defaults

Research integrity

Sources

Apache Tomcat CVE-2025-24813: when partial PUT and write-enabled uploads become a bigger problem

Apache Tomcat CVE-2025-24813 stood out because it depended on specific configuration conditions rather than affecting every server equally, which means defenders had to understand their deployment instead of reacting only to headlines.

What the advisory tells defenders

Apache documented the issue in its security pages and described how write-enabled default servlet behavior combined with partial PUT handling could create a much more dangerous path.

Upload workflows are easy to underestimate, especially in old Java environments where teams inherited defaults years ago and never validated them again.

What to review immediately

  • whether writes are enabled on the default servlet anywhere
  • which applications expose upload paths publicly
  • whether legacy deployment guides introduced risky defaults

Response priorities

  1. patch supported Tomcat branches
  2. audit upload and partial PUT behavior in real applications
  3. document safe servlet defaults in infrastructure-as-code

These steps matter because security alerts are not only about version numbers. They are about exposure, trust boundaries, and whether an organization can verify that the fix actually reduced the real attack path. Teams searching for guidance on a CVE usually want more than just a short warning. They want to know what else to inspect after the patch and what assumptions to challenge while the issue is still fresh.

Why this deserves search visibility

Searchers looking for this vulnerability are usually trying to answer three practical questions at once: how serious is the issue, what environments are really affected, and what should be checked after remediation. Articles that answer those questions clearly tend to perform better in Google because they match intent rather than just repeating an advisory.

Bottom line

This is a patch-and-verify issue. Version remediation matters, but configuration reality matters just as much.

Frequently asked questions

Action 1

patch supported Tomcat branches

Action 2

audit upload and partial PUT behavior in real applications

Action 3

document safe servlet defaults in infrastructure-as-code

This content is for educational and defensive security purposes only. Do not use this information against systems you do not own or have explicit permission to test.

Keep reading

Related articles

More coverage connected to this topic, category, or research path.

Written by

Eng. Hussein Ali Al-Assaad

Cybersecurity Expert

Cybersecurity expert focused on exploitation research, penetration testing, threat analysis and technologies.

Discussion

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.